How the United States Ranks

Sometimes people say to me "WHy don't you just have your children the "normal" way?" which of course translates into "The typical American way". What I am not always sure how to convey to them is that the AMERICAN WAY is not the BEST or NORMAL way! Here are some recent stats and summary by a great author. Cut and paste begins - Angela <><

HOW THE UNITED STATES RANKS

There are precious few situations in life where the cheaper alternatives is also the better alternative – and maternity care is one. If we eradicated the unjustified obstetric monopoly in the United States, with its extreme medicalization of birth, and replace it with a humanized maternity care, we can vastly improve the care of women and babies, lower death rates for both women and babies, and save vast sums of money at the same time.

A few facts:

Percentage of gross national product spent on health care
1966: 6 percent
1992: 12 percent

Percentage by which U.S. health care expenditures exceed those of
Canada: 40 percent
Germany: 90 percent
Japan: 100 percent

The twenty-two countries with lower infant mortality rates than the U.S.: Japan, Sweden, Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong, Netherlands, France, Ireland, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Scotland, Australia, Northern Ireland, Spain, England and Wales, Belgium, Austria, Italy.

Percentage of countries with lower infant mortality rates than the US that provide universal prenatal care: 100 percent

Percentage of US women who receive little or no prenatal care: 25 percent

Chances that a woman with little or no prenatal care will give birth to a low-weight baby(less than 5.5lbs) or premature baby(less than 37wks): 1 in 2

Factor most closely associated with infant death: low birth weight

Percentage of infant deaths link to low birth weight: 60 percent

Average cost of long-term care(through age 35) for a low-birth-weight baby: $50,5588

Average cost of long-term care (through age 35) for a baby of average birth weight: $20,003

Cost of newborn intensive care for one infant: $20,00 to $100,00

Cost of prenatal care for thirty women: $20,000 to $100,000

Percentage of births attended principally by midwives (CNM’s and CPM’s):
United States: 10 percent
European Nations: 75 percent

Percentage of countries with lower infant mortality rates than the US in which midwives are principal birth attendants: 100 percent

Average cost of a midwife-attendant birth in the US: $1,200

Average cost of a physician-attended vaginal birth in the US: $4,200

Health care cost savings obtainable by using midwifery care for 75 percent of pregnancies in the US: $8.5 BILLION per year

Cost per year of using routine electronic fetal monitoring during every childbirth: $750 million

Number of well-constructed scientific studies in which routine electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) during every birth has been proven more effective than the simple stethoscope to monitor the fetal heart: zero

Health care cost savings obtainable by eliminating the routine use of electronic fetal monitoring in every birth: $675 per year

US C-section rate: 1965: 5 percent, 2004: 29.1 percent, 2007: 33.3 percent

Cesaren section rate targeted by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): 12 percent

The eighteen industrialized nations and states with lower C-section rates than the US: Czech Rebubplic, Japan, Hungary, Netherlafnds, England and Wales, New Zealand, Switzerland, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Greece, Portugal, Italy, Denmark, Scotland, Bavaria, Australia, Canada.
Percentage of women in the US with C-sections who undergo repeat c-sections today: 91 percent

Ratio of women dying from C-section to women dying from vaginal birth: 4 to 1

Average cost of a C-section birth: $7,826

Health care cost savings obtainable by bringing the US C-section rare into compliance with recommendaton from WHO and the federal Department of Health and Human Services: $1.5 billion a year

Source: Born in the USA by Marsden Wagner,M.D. , 2006